GeekSmack Community: Post Your Overclock - GeekSmack Community

Jump to content



  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Post Your Overclock

#1 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 March 2010 - 01:13 AM

This is a thread devoted to all of the hardware enthusiasts out there who seek to push their hardware to the absolute edge. So post your overclocks here! I'll start:

Core i7 920 D0 Batch 3845B260 @ 4.4 GHz

Attached File(s)


Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#2 User is offline   Eugene C 

  • Beaver
  • Group: Senior Editor
  • Posts: 3,638
  • Joined: 18-September 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 March 2010 - 01:14 AM

View PostChris123NT, on 06 March 2010 - 01:13 AM, said:

This is a thread devoted to all of the hardware enthusiasts out there who seek to push their hardware to the absolute edge. So post your overclocks here! I'll start:

Core i7 920 D0 Batch 3845B260 @ 4.4 GHz

I think you won.
Posted Image

Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
0

#3 User is offline   Paul 

  • ^^Hmm...
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 2,431
  • Joined: 20-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fort Lauderdale, FL

Posted 06 March 2010 - 03:56 AM

Wow, awesome OC there Chris Posted Image

Glad to see you got it stable. I'm sure this is as far as you're gonna go though, as pushing it further is something you only want to do if you have a spare i7 920 lying around to take its place should you nuke it through overvolting. :P
0

#4 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 March 2010 - 06:29 AM

View PostPaul, on 06 March 2010 - 03:56 AM, said:

Wow, awesome OC there Chris Posted Image

Glad to see you got it stable. I'm sure this is as far as you're gonna go though, as pushing it further is something you only want to do if you have a spare i7 920 lying around to take its place should you nuke it through overvolting. :P

Pushing it any further for 24/7 usage would be iffy. I thought about gunning for 4.5 but I dunno if it's worth it lol
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#5 User is offline   Loebl 

  • Bronze Geek
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 157
  • Joined: 21-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 06 March 2010 - 10:46 AM

View PostChris123NT, on 06 March 2010 - 06:29 AM, said:

View PostPaul, on 06 March 2010 - 03:56 AM, said:

Wow, awesome OC there Chris Posted Image

Glad to see you got it stable. I'm sure this is as far as you're gonna go though, as pushing it further is something you only want to do if you have a spare i7 920 lying around to take its place should you nuke it through overvolting. :P

Pushing it any further for 24/7 usage would be iffy. I thought about gunning for 4.5 but I dunno if it's worth it lol


depends... You could use the excess heat to power a pan and make your morning egg
1

#6 User is offline   Link Tamake 

  • Epic graphic designer/coder
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 386
  • Joined: 06-August 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorkshire
  • Interests:asdfg

Posted 06 March 2010 - 06:43 PM

Offtopic Comment

Posted Image
0

#7 User is offline   David 

  • I do not live in an igloo.
  • Group: Senior Editor
  • Posts: 262
  • Joined: 13-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 06 March 2010 - 07:57 PM

Holy crap, LinX is a hell of a stress test though. There's no application out there that will ever put as much stress on your CPU as LinX does.

When running a Prime95 Blend test on my OC, my temps peak at about 55C. When running LinX, they peak at 85C. The only reason they don't go higher is because 85C is my emergency shutdown threshold :P

If you can run a few hours of P95 Blend, it's stable IMO. See if you can get to 4.5 with that.
0

#8 User is offline   Ryan Price 

  • Anaconda
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,956
  • Joined: 20-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Little Rock, AR

Posted 06 March 2010 - 09:05 PM

My old conservative ways...85C is just too hot in my opinion...even stressed. i remember when people would freak out over 55-60C!

"Fallen Is He Who Once Soared...."

Posted Image

Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
0

#9 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 04:27 AM

Huzzah! Will post more details later Posted Image

Attached File  huzzah.png (52.95K)
Number of downloads: 31

Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#10 User is offline   Patrick Laughner 

  • YHALLOWTHAR
  • Group: Senior Editor
  • Posts: 2,275
  • Joined: 07-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 04:31 AM

got it already huh.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
0

#11 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 04:33 AM

View PostPatrick Laughner, on 28 April 2010 - 04:31 AM, said:

got it already huh.

Yeah, seems to be a damn good batch too, as most others are requiring well over 1.4v for 4.4 GHz, so definitely happy with it so far. It KILLS the 920 clock for clock.
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#12 User is offline   Mitchell 

  • Llama Llama Duck
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 678
  • Joined: 27-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greenock, Scotland UK

Posted 28 April 2010 - 06:51 AM

View PostChris123NT, on 28 April 2010 - 04:33 AM, said:

Yeah, seems to be a damn good batch too, as most others are requiring well over 1.4v for 4.4 GHz, so definitely happy with it so far. It KILLS the 920 clock for clock.


So under that voltage wasn't possible for 4.4GHz then?

I know you were testing it at insanely low amounts last night.



Posted Image

Posted Image
0

#13 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 11:00 AM

View PostMitchell, on 28 April 2010 - 06:51 AM, said:

View PostChris123NT, on 28 April 2010 - 04:33 AM, said:

Yeah, seems to be a damn good batch too, as most others are requiring well over 1.4v for 4.4 GHz, so definitely happy with it so far. It KILLS the 920 clock for clock.


So under that voltage wasn't possible for 4.4GHz then?

I know you were testing it at insanely low amounts last night.




Prime95 passed without issue at as low as 1.32 volts, but linx wouldn't run longer than 3 mins. Just goes to show why I use LinX over prime. The voltage is still pretty respectable though, most of the guys on the evga forums are breaking the 1.4v barrier to hit 4.4.
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#14 User is offline   Mitchell 

  • Llama Llama Duck
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 678
  • Joined: 27-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greenock, Scotland UK

Posted 28 April 2010 - 12:44 PM

View PostChris123NT, on 28 April 2010 - 11:00 AM, said:

Prime95 passed without issue at as low as 1.32 volts, but linx wouldn't run longer than 3 mins. Just goes to show why I use LinX over prime. The voltage is still pretty respectable though, most of the guys on the evga forums are breaking the 1.4v barrier to hit 4.4.


Well you never know, Prime stable might just do it for 24/7 use but if not then I guess you could always play around with it more to get <1.388v at 4.4. The chip might just be capable of that lower Vcore.

I generally stress test on both Prime95 and LinX until I have an overclock 24/7 stable with both applications, although I do prefer LinX to Prime95 most of the time.
Posted Image

Posted Image
0

#15 User is offline   Patrick Laughner 

  • YHALLOWTHAR
  • Group: Senior Editor
  • Posts: 2,275
  • Joined: 07-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 01:15 PM

You know, 1.4 ~ 1.45v is was most considered the absolute safe limit to the 45nm, So I'm guessing the 32nm might be a tad lower. I'd try not to go too far above 1.4v on it.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
0

#16 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 01:48 PM

View PostPatrick Laughner, on 28 April 2010 - 01:15 PM, said:

You know, 1.4 ~ 1.45v is was most considered the absolute safe limit to the 45nm, So I'm guessing the 32nm might be a tad lower. I'd try not to go too far above 1.4v on it.

Intel's spec sheet says 1.4 so I'm trying to stay as close to that as possible, but there's guys running near 1.5v on good cooling and not having any problems.

These CPU's run COOL, my hottest core wasn't even hitting 60C last night under full load.
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#17 User is offline   Mitchell 

  • Llama Llama Duck
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 678
  • Joined: 27-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greenock, Scotland UK

Posted 28 April 2010 - 01:49 PM

View PostPatrick Laughner, on 28 April 2010 - 01:15 PM, said:

You know, 1.4 ~ 1.45v is was most considered the absolute safe limit to the 45nm, So I'm guessing the 32nm might be a tad lower. I'd try not to go too far above 1.4v on it.


Well according to Intel the max VID Voltage range for both 45nm and 32nm LGA1366 based Core i7's is 1.375v exactly. Personally I'd never run 45 or 32nm Intel chips above 1.42v for 24/7 use unless I was using a more extreme cooling solution such as Phase Change.
Posted Image

Posted Image
0

#18 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:00 PM

View PostMitchell, on 28 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

View PostPatrick Laughner, on 28 April 2010 - 01:15 PM, said:

You know, 1.4 ~ 1.45v is was most considered the absolute safe limit to the 45nm, So I'm guessing the 32nm might be a tad lower. I'd try not to go too far above 1.4v on it.


Well according to Intel the max VID Voltage range for both 45nm and 32nm LGA1366 based Core i7's is 1.375v exactly. Personally I'd never run 45 or 32nm Intel chips above 1.42v for 24/7 use unless I was using a more extreme cooling solution such as Phase Change.

The spec sheet I saw for gulftown said 1.4, where did you see 1.375?

Anyway when I get home gonna try more tweaking. Apparently LOWERING the CPU PLL Vcore can get more stability, it's at 1.8 by default
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

#19 User is offline   Mitchell 

  • Llama Llama Duck
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 678
  • Joined: 27-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greenock, Scotland UK

Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:11 PM

View PostChris123NT, on 28 April 2010 - 02:00 PM, said:

The spec sheet I saw for gulftown said 1.4, where did you see 1.375?


I saw it on the Intel website under the VID voltage range for that chip.

http://ark.intel.com...t.aspx?id=47932





Posted Image

Posted Image
0

#20 User is offline   Chris123NT 

  • Huzzah!
  • Group: Management
  • Posts: 1,455
  • Joined: 03-October 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 April 2010 - 02:14 PM

View PostMitchell, on 28 April 2010 - 02:11 PM, said:

View PostChris123NT, on 28 April 2010 - 02:00 PM, said:

The spec sheet I saw for gulftown said 1.4, where did you see 1.375?


I saw it on the Intel website under the VID voltage range for that chip.

http://ark.intel.com...t.aspx?id=47932

Ah right, well I'm treating my own limit to 1.425 or so, it's crazy because the temps are so low, my radiator doesn't even get warm, and it definitely got warm when I would crank the 920 D0.
Posted ImagePosted Image
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This page is sponsored by TopHostingCenter.com, a web hosting provider that specializes in cloud hosting.

As well as Hosted Exchange